베오그라드조약 관련 자료 이시우 2006/05/11 635

미국과 서구의 베오그라드 조약 반대

http://www.coldwar.hu/html/en/chronologies/borhi1.html

July 30.-August 18.
The Danube conference opens in Belgrade with the participation of ten nations. With seven votes to one (the US and Great Britain abstained, France voted against), the Soviet proposal on the international control of navigation on the river Danube is passed, which excludes the Western powers from participation. The Western powers did not participate in the signing ceremony. – The State Department accused the Soviet Union of “political and economic enslavement” of the Danubian peoples and announced: the US does not accept the convention for itself or the US zones of Germany and Austria. The other Western powers did not comment.

유엔국제법위원회에서 든 사례

http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_sr685.pdf

35. With regard to what had been wrongly called the
retrospective effect of peremptory rules, he also shared
Mr. Ago’s view. New rules of public order became
operative as from their acceptance and they produced
an immediate effect on treaties concluded earlier. If
that were not the case, there could be no progress. At
the Danube Conference of 1948, for example, the representatives
of certain States had raised the question of
acquired rights.6 Moreover, two great principles had
been proclaimed by the Conference – namely, the right
of riparian States to be sole administrators of the international
waterway and the equality of flags in navigation.
7 The problem was outside the scope of the present
discussion, but it was pertinent to mention that rights
acquired under pre-existing treaties were valid so long
as the order under which those treaties had been concluded
subsisted; if the order changed, those so-called
acquired rights should be extinguished or amended. In
such a case – on the assumption, of course, that the
change was due to evolution and not revolution – all
jurists were agreed that the existing order should be
preserved until after any such radical changes had
occurred, when there must be a period of adjustment
and transitional measures to facilitate the change-over
from one regime to the other.

6 Conference Danubienne, Belgrade, 1948, Ministere des Affaires
Etrangeres, Proces-Verbaux des stances plenieres.
7 Ibid. Convention relative au regime de la navigation sur le
Danube, p. 373, article 1, and p. 379, article 26.